which is a terrible idea of you care about the human cost

Once you’re at the point of advocating for voting in genocidal right wingers, you’ve lost the ability to just dismiss things out of hand by invoking the “human cost”.

Labour will make fighting capitalism that little bit easier.

Citation needed mate. I’m pretty sure you just mean you’ll be more materially comfortable under Labour.

My Iraqi friends assure me that America will be created as liberators

as well as from an analysis of satellite imagery and data.

Wow, that is sneaky: making it sound like the did the analysis themselves, when they actually got it from the right wing military industrial think tank ASPI

The majority of the interviewees were Kazakh, a minority were Uyghurs

???

Yeah?

Great! I salute your rigour in the matter. How many of them was it?

Maybe you should have some rigour yourself, rather than immediately descending into bad faith time wasting.

There are 430 hits for “Amnesty International interview” as sources.

And how many interviews does that correspond to? Who was interviewed and what did they actually say? When you strip out all the unsubstantiated Zenz stuff, how much of the story is still left?

I have figured it out: many of them. And no, Amnesty did not produce a significant amount of primary evidence. You’re just straight up lying now.

but their report does contain a total of 718 sources.

And how many of those sources cite Zenz themselves?

“If you disagree with me, you aren’t human”

If Reagan was never elected, Clinton never would be either. I also see no reason why you think you’d have Obama still after Gore. You make it sound like the Lewinsky scandal is the only reason that Democrats didn’t get 32 straight years in office.

Oh yeah, just peaceful balkanization

Yeah, the peace-prefer calling to “wipe Russia off the map”. Fuck off you Nazi freak.

Fuck off, fascist

I am shocked at how many liberals genuinely cannot seem to tell the difference between wanting something to be true and it actually being true.

Yeah? Where did you hear this?

Clinton mostly became president by embracing Reaganism, so he didn’t really pave the path and it did continue

Are you 12?

Noted Russian troll farm: The New York Times. Could you shitlibs at least pretend that “Russian trolls” doesn’t just mean “anyone who disagrees with you”?.

And the absolute smooth brained “leftists” on the fediverse are up voting this incoherent nonsense

“Trying to actually take actions to bring about change is not useful, and we should discard it. Instead we should focus on the important thing: complaining about Drumpf online”.

How is the weather at Eglin?

We need to stop with the praxis

Yes, hello officer

Big “science is just another religion!” energy.

Which part are you having trouble with?