And you have to pay for Luol Deng.

Tolerance is tangential to humanization. You can be tolerant of a human. You can also be intolerant of a human.

Do you use this for physical machines too?

There are people who are fully owners and don’t do any labour, and those who subsist entirely on their labour and don’t own anything. Would it be fair to say that the middle class is anyone who works but still owns a non-zero amount of appreciating or revenue-generating assets?

Easy for computers doesn’t mean it’s easy for humans, and vice versa.

But you cannot defy the laws of thermodynamics, so if you make anything colder, you need to absorb the energy to do so and vice versa. First time using this power and you accidentally made something too cold? Sounds like you just burned to death.

In the eyes of the universe, everything is simply an effect. There are no side-effects, so nothing you can redo despite having that ability.

Depending on the person, this might be a bonus.

Calories are expensive, and I’m not made of money.

Right, that’s a fair criticism with regards to microtransactions. I don’t know much about those kinds of games though, so I can’t really say much about it.

My partner bought Skyrim twice (Steam and Switch) and 100%'d both, and now is going through the same process with BG3. I’m just thinking about how the achievement system is acting like a multiplier to the game’s value in this instance.

In a system where you pay once for the game, isn’t that a good thing? It lets you enjoy the game for longer instead of making you constantly buy new games, thus spending less money for the same amount of enjoyment.

Even then, you can probably trust a source to not lie, but you can’t trust them to never get fooled.

For me, it’s a matter of restoring the convenience and UX that you’ve given up by leaving the big providers.

Quite the conundrum. I work better alone, but I want to go far.

If they’re disagreeing about objective reality

I always enjoy hearing about how people come to believe what they do. There’s pretty much always a logical basis for it and the difference just comes down to their heuristics failing at one particular point and cascading.

You don’t eat at home?

What’s more surprising to me is that there’s a big enough stream of reviews for a candle to see this effect.

Cut them up and eat it with a spoon

The rice and bean barons will be competing for your attention.

You’ll have to clarify what you mean by nutrients. I’m seeing some disagreements in the comments about whether things are nutritious or not because they’re using different definitions.

E.g. are you looking for high Calorie? Proteins and healthy fats? Large quantity of micronutrients? Large diversity of micronutrients? Or something else?