don’t make me cry.

A BBC journalist ran the image through an AI chatbot which identified key spots that may have been manipulated.

WTF?

Doesn’t the fucking BBC have at least 1 or 2 experts for spotting fakes? RAN THROUGH AN AI CHATBOT?? SERIOUSLY??

It seems my moving away from major tech companies is working well, I didn’t even notice there was an outage (again).

uff. this is very hard.

This is a good idea, thanks.

Wayland should have been the HotNewShit© that the crazy people use, and everything learned from that experiment should have become the ACTUAL next thing everyone uses.
Pushing wayland like it is now was a bad idea.

I would have loved to wait for it’s successor, but “use LTS old versions or eat shit” is apparently acceptable now.

It works great! Now I only very rarely need to tell people to go away.

“Hi, I’m very friendly, you don’t have to be afraid of me, i don’t want to harm you, we are identical!”

as someone over forty: Have a hearty FUCK YOU, and buckle up snowflake.

Oh wow. Space dog. That is too far friend, too far.

wy dont yu fall on yor sord? huh?

humour

now i’m curious, your comment could lean both ways, which button did/would you push?

Good riddance

Needs more details, but I’m listening.

I hate this framing. They don’t “THREATEN” to leave europe.

Europe is about to change laws that makes their product illegal.

depends entirely on your definition of robot if it came true or not.

fuck gnome.

This is my professional opinion.

Brightness is a scale. Light (color) is a spectrum.
Gayness is a scale, and someone can be the gayest.
Gayness is a spectrum, and everyone can be different kinds of gay.

Simple sience. which is mostly gay. scientifically gay.

no.

One person could be the gayest, if it was a scale, not a spectrum.