petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-22 years agoRustDesk: I Found This Open-Source TeamViewer Alternative Impressive!news.itsfoss.comexternal-linkmessage-square100linkfedilinkarrow-up1260arrow-down152file-text
arrow-up1208arrow-down1external-linkRustDesk: I Found This Open-Source TeamViewer Alternative Impressive!news.itsfoss.competsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-22 years agomessage-square100linkfedilinkfile-text
Please have a look at the warnings in the comments: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/21632052/12893621 https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/21632052/12897257
minus-squareboredsquirrel (he)@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up42·2 years ago@petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de you might want to add that warning to the post. They also tried to submit the app to Flathub, but had way too broad permissions with no explanation why. “Users expect filesystem access” etc. In the end it was rejected and they publish a .flatpak file themselves. https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/5233 The other points are far worse though.
minus-squareKarna@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 years ago Rustdesk controversy The whole discussion on that pull request is extremely sketchy, IMO.
@petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de you might want to add that warning to the post.
They also tried to submit the app to Flathub, but had way too broad permissions with no explanation why. “Users expect filesystem access” etc. In the end it was rejected and they publish a .flatpak file themselves.
https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/5233
The other points are far worse though.
The whole discussion on that pull request is extremely sketchy, IMO.