• SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    Basically that’s what they did with Ocean’s 11. The original Frank Sinatra version was shit. But it was a good idea, a crew of super cool dudes get together to rob a casino.

    They remade it and it was very successful.

    The Thing has a similar origin.

    But it’s rare things like that happen because Hollywood execs usually need an existing property with good numbers to greenlight a movie.

    • Rusty@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      For a second I thought you were trying to say that The Thing (2011) is a better remake of The Thing (1982), but then I remembered that 1951 version exists.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    Virtually every single bad adaptation can be directly traced back to studio interference.

    Movies like LoTR only happened because the studios thought it would be a colossal flop, and so left the directors and producers alone.

    If you want great movies, the studios need to leave the producers and directors the hell alone.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Counterpoint: Game of Thrones. The studio would have been happy to give them a few more seasons to develop a better ending. It’s the creators who gave up and phoned in the ending we got.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        George RR Martin is the creator of game of thrones, not the show runners.

        Oh wait, the original example was lotr, which also was based on books lol. Nevermind me, carry on.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      Writing is the only thing that matters. I point to “Everything Everywhere All at Once” and “Amsterdam”. The latter of which had 4x the budget.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Well to be fair I had way too much weed beforehand but like. Ehhhhh. It felt like a circlejerk for random famous people. Also Taylor Swift cannot act.

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    Word War Z.

    Have it actually be a mocumentary with interviews. Once people start talking switch to the scene. It is a collection of short stories. Would be fun.

    Or make it a mini series.

    • Sippy Cup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Movies are being made to mitigate risk. Take a polar thing and just do that again, that’ll suck people in right???

      God forbid they do something new and interesting with the material, that can’t possibly work.

      The only time I can think of where a remake ended up working out was with the recent planet of the apes movies. Where, you know, they took the premise and did something new and interesting with it. But even THEN, there was a completely different remake that failed to innovate outside of the last few minutes and those were confusing are best.

  • Alteon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    This is how we’ve ended up with 17 different attempts at the fucking Fantastic Four. Each one is shit, and EVERY director thinks that they’ve got the chops to make it work.

    Hollywood…please…fucking stop. It doesn’t get better. It’s a cursed movie. Stop fucking trying to get the Fantastic Four to work. Just…put the poor thing out of its misery and let it sleep peacefully.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’d go one further. Do longer run remakes for good source material that ended up with a bad movie.

    Golden Compass Movie = bad

    His Dark Materials limited series = fantastic

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      Do longer run remakes for good source material that ended up with a bad movie.

      I immediately thought The Hobbit for some reason.

      God that trilogy was so painful.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        I immediately thought The Hobbit for some reason.

        God that trilogy was so painful.

        That doesn’t count. There was a bunch of stuff in those movie that never happened in the source material.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Ghost in the Shell was an unnecessary remake of a fantastic original animation that was improved by the series that followed it. There was never a need for a live action version.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I don’t care what anyone says, the worldbuilding that was done for the 1990s Super Mario Bros. movie was awesome and if the movie had lived up to it, it would have been great.

    Remember that when the movie was made, Mario was a plumber that jumped on mushrooms and turtles to save a princess and he had a brother named Luigi that did the same thing. That was pretty much the entire storyline they had to work with.

  • darko8472@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I would love a proper remake of Eragon. That movie felt so rushed, like they just chopped the meat out of the story and gave us the bloody mush instead of the whole thing.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Or roll with some story driven videogames. TONS of content compatible with the big screen, provided they put someone who actually knows the franchise in charge.

    Mass Effect comes to mind.

    Or a SW film focused on Revan or Kreia.

    They already fucked up Halo with the TV series, but an unrelated movie could be good.

    Half Life… jfc, Half Life 3 as a movie would be simultaneously such a slap in the dick and absolutely hilarious for not giving us a game. Definitely cinematic potential.

    Elder Scrolls or Enderal.

    Deus Ex.

    Pooooossibly Legacy of Kain - admittedly hard to see them getting that one right as a movie, but it’s a take on vampirism that I don’t think anything comparable has made it onto the big screen. If it went well, it’d be a nice redemption after all the Twilight BS.

    This has the potential to become a very long list, but that’s the point: there is some KICK ASS content that the big screen hasn’t ever touched, so rather than remaking old flops, bring on some adaptations!

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      The anime is great. The recent remake is flashy but lacks the souls of the original. It wasn’t as bad as some critical and box office perform made out, but when a remake is worse than the original, what’s the point?

      • iterable@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        I mean nothing is as good as the original Manga. But each has changed the story a little to make it interesting. The live action was above average in my book. Not talking Blade Runner levels but enjoyed it.