it’s also wrong™, but i think attraction is a complicated thing and unlikely to be extrinsically changed after it forms. not that the process of said formation is free from bigotry exposed to, but shaming people for certain attractions instead of, say, focusing on improving representation, inclusivity, and normalization in the environment is more likely to make them fodder and supporters for bigotry. though attraction biases are a symptom of bigotry, this is one of those cases imo where it’s much better to treat the cause over the symptom.
wiki-user: Aatube
Now mostly on @Aatube@kbin.melroy.org . I use this account as a backup.
- 0 Posts
- 11 Comments
i know it’s satire. i’m wondering how genderqueer people would react to people sincerely saying that irl
sorry if this is an offensive question by any chance, but how would you react to someone irl saying “There’s no poetry in a body that hasn’t been a site of transformation and reclamation. I find the unaltered, cisgender body to be lacking a certain history.”?
not me thinking this was serious and an interesting valid perspective 😭
Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
memes@lemmy.world•I know nothing about computers but this does not add upEnglish
3·5 months agojpeg xl has even less default support tho unless you use a mac
Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Technology@lemmy.world•The AI company Perplexity is complaining their bots can't bypass Cloudflare's firewallEnglish
4·5 months agoThat same logic is how Aaron Swartz was cornered into suicide for scraping JSTOR, something widely agreed to be a bad idea by a wide range of lawspeople including SCOTUS in its 2021 decision Van Buren v. US that struck this interpretation off the books.
Even Apple is gradually changing to USB C which also works on all directions, plus sometimes my lightning cables only work in a certain direction
Raising animals already depletes a lot more resources than just farming
Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Technology@beehaw.org•The Release Date and Key Features of Windows 12 UnveiledEnglish
8·3 years ago11 is almost just a reskin of 10


This is a New York Times article. By default, the New York Times is the citation, just like every other MSM. And even then, this specific article does attribute it:
The article only said they made a test, not that they weren’t failing it, which happens to be what the linked paper says. This is not new as LLMs also always failed a certain intelligence test devised around that same time period until ~2024.
That’s 55%: https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2025/1/e71065