melitele

Based

Soul=mind

Radical atheism is just saying no a priori and being purposefully dense and closed around the subject.

Reclaiming healthy spirituality as a personal practice instead of an institution is the only way to beat them, radical atheism will never work because most people need a connection to the world that goes beyond what’s material. Their mind, ergo their soul (psyche) is immaterial, and selling a worldview that cancels that immateriality is doomed to fail, leaving them to flock towards snake oil dealers

huh, so AI WILL solve climate change, lol

I’m in the PopOs stage!

Jesus christ the comments in this thread…

A lot of people making baseless claims about it being inevitable…i mean it could happen but the hard problem of consciousness is not inevitable to solve

unemployed = more free time to organize!

yes, create a legion of angry, unemployed/unemployable people, that will go well for the capitalist system

if you follow MAD theory you could consider Nukes a defensive weapon…

i bet it’s nukes

Everything is political

The word yoy might be looking for is “ideological”

Religion is politics, and I think the abrahimic religions were the most succesful propaganda of all time. I’m talking regarding humankind and its relationship with the test of nature. Religione got turned into a weapon against the actually creations of divinity

Yes but the first written stories are most probably oral myths handed down for generations before finally being writ

I don’t think monotheism was a big thing before. I just suspect that early religions were created with a respect and fear of nature and that the deities served as a foil for all the forces of nature around humans. Our way of life was to live among divinity, and in reverence to it. Then monotheism arrives, alongside so called “civilization”, sedentarism allows dominion over nature, and a new philosophy comes. This philosophy is a dogmatical undermining of the creative forces of nature (mostly represented as femme) in favour of a pragmatical and extractive view (“you will not have any god other than me”) allowing for a disrespect of natural resources that a direct connection to our current climate change problem.

It was a direct attempt at removing the ancient values of coexistence with nature, starting with oppressing femmininity and undermining what they historically and spiritually represented.

I am not throwing out monotheistic religion, I am not throwing out religion at all. You are right in saying I’m “exchanging” one religious view from another, but my feeling is that the original meaning of spirituality has been tainted by ancient propaganda.

This is all speculation, I’d be lying if I said otherwise, but in seeing the powers that be today and the way they act, and think…it just all seems so convenient to say that humanity is “naturally” inclined to fuck up their land. I do not believe that. I believe that humanity is naturally inclined to be gullible, and that someone made us believe we were above nature and should destroy and make violence to it, exactly what we are taught to do with women and feminility in general.

I just don’t believe it is a coincidence

So the biblical god was just an amalgamation of stories from the bloody reign of some possibly prehistoric warchiefs, it seems to me

They patriarchy erased most matriarchal myth and cultures during the dawn of sedentarism

Your point is based on an idealistic and wishful “uncorruot government”. You cannot have an uncorrupt government. What’s needed is a different form of political decision making, one where the common folk participates in the political questions, not just some answers, where accountability is protected and a priority.

I don’t know the exact blueprint for this, maybe it is as unattainable as an “uncorrupted government”. What I know is that nobody really tried it yet, while so called “liberal democracy” has proven its failings to all and the fascist have been taking advantage of those failings since the start. The only way yo avoid this is to change our questions, not to all agree on the answers

Yeah I understand, and I like the decision, i hope my sentence example was of help

Generally with animals the “it” pronoun fits best, but i think they phrase itself need reworking, i understand that you can’t today say but i think it’s a difficult way toc phrase it the way toc wrote it.

Maybe “this is the monkey I suspect is seeing my ears”