I’m unsure of what a finite planet is referencing? Is op suggesting that economic limits are constrained to finite resources? This doesn’t take into account renewables, human creativity and a whole list of other things. If we create a matrix like environment where the limits can be expanded and create new products in that new environment we can still use fiat.

Who cares that’s ages away /s

I think it’s why he drifted right. He couldn’t handle being called out on his bullshit so he needed to find a group of people who wouldn’t question him

Thanks for the info, i didn’t know that and understand it a bit better now.

I think if it’s going on every windows computer windows should have a process in place to prevent what happened from happening. Windows are for profit, they have the money to do it right but they got greedy. A staggered rollout would have prevented most of it and is a very simple thing to require. Also if it’s going on every windows computer or most I wouldn’t consider that a third party anymore even if that’s how they keep liabilities at arms length

Doesn’t Microsoft allow crowdstrike to make updates? Being such a critical part of the OS it’s up to Microsoft to ensure their procedures are robust and being followed.

So why is this considered a crowdstrike issue and not a Microsoft fuckup?

As someone who knows nothing about this stuff, yes.

Mildly to firmly squeeze your penis while moving your hand back and forward

good riddance

To be honest this scenario takes me less energy than the idea that one side is indiscriminately killing and torturing 100% innocent people purely based on their tribe. I still believe 95% of the stories are biased or missing important context but I can accept that there are going to be outliers that are plain evil even within context. For example the actions on oct 8 were plain evil even within context. If you can justify those actions as reasonable you can justify these actions as reasonable.

I haven’t read the article but I always get funny about titles like this. “He posed no threat” could mean a completely innocent bystander although you would think the title would have said that because it would get more clicks, or an enemy combatant who had killed or wounded some idf soldiers before being wounded himself and then “posing no threat.” Not saying it’s right but if a good friend had just been killed by this person I can at the very least understand why they may have done what is being implied.

You’re a sick son of a bitch

I don’t see Native Americans with their own military or government. And if they were determined to form their own while blatantly insisting they would use that power to destroy you, I doubt you would be cheering them on.

You think native Americans should mandate the total destruction of all other Americans who weren’t there before them? Oh now I see what’s going on here.

Do you feel the same way about native Americans?

Don’t Hamas have a mandate of the total destruction of Israel?

Why is this downvoted?

How will people convert convenience into money and become rich at the expense of future generations?

I thought Hamas, which is made up of Palestinians were also the terrorists because you know, the terror attacks they did?

Probably written by ChatGPT