It is an incentive, just not price. People can choose to support a food system that provides a better living, less environmental damage, and other priorities. More people could choose that if they had more disposable income and I don’t fault people for defaulting to price when making purchasing decisions.
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: February 23rd, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
SupahRevs@lemmy.worldto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Do people really not care that we live in a society that favours assholes or are there so many more assholes than nice people that it's unstoppable?
2·6 months agoDarwin talked about societies and advancement in species around communication. It is important for us to be able to communicate threats in order to build community. Assholes don’t build lasting societies.
SupahRevs@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Google says it will change Gulf of Mexico to 'Gulf of America' in Maps after government updatesEnglish
2·1 year agoWhat are going to use for email now?

Correct. The system is supposed to encourage investment in efficient energy production so that it can sell energy at the level of the most expensive energy that is brought to market. Resources for the Future explains it like this:
The capacity market auction works as follows: generators set their bid price at an amount equal to the cost of keeping their plant available to operate if needed. Similar to the energy market, these bids are arranged from lowest to highest. Once the bids reach the required quantity that all the retailers collectively must acquire to meet expected peak demand plus a reserve margin, the market “clears”, or supply meets demand. At this point, generators that “cleared” the market, or were chosen to provide capacity, all receive the same clearing price which is determined by the bid price of the last generator used to meet demand.