That’s the joke

Fae behavior, stg

Why? That’s what the account bio is for

All good. Maybe just be a bit more specific next time so it doesn’t sound like you’re saying “(((minorities)))”

You could be right but I’d rather let 'em answer the question for themself.

which ones?

Wait, is this not the guy who killed someone by bombing a fertility clinic? Did I just make the assumption that this was the same guy???

Aww, but stirring shit from a third instance is fun!!!

Must be pretty embarrassing for .ml that shitlib central got a terrorist before they did, ngl.

Holy shit, thank you, finally someone in this thread is still living in the same reality as I am.

I gave her the standard score because, even though she failed the task, she tried really hard to read out all those difficult words and I thought that was probably more work than anyone else had done.

That is a tragic indictment on the state of your class. You are failing your students by refusing to give them failing marks for this shit.

• Require students to cite their sources

• Require students to show their working

• Ask students questions related to the process of a given task during class

• For things like media analysis, require them to do it with a pencil and paper without the use of computers where possible

• Treat the use of LLMs as an act of academic plagiarism

All of these are things that schools should already be doing holy shit

Holy fuck, we are so cooked.

This is such a concavebrained take. The point of exercises handed out in schools isn’t the accomplishment of the set tasks; it’s that students internalise the processes necessary to do the task themselves and thereby learn those skills.

Thus, giving away a task to a LLM is only “using their imagination on how to constructively solve [the] problem, utilising a tool in their imaginary bag” in the same way that bullying a nerd into doing the work for them used to be.

I think it’s changing the traditional paradigm. Maybe for the better, maybe not. Time will tell. I think ChatGPT is a tool in its infancy. It’s changing the way minds think fundamentally like for isntance critical thinking skills decline by relying on “AI” but it frees up the mind to grow in other ways to adjust to the new paradigm.

This is so obviously for the worse. Losing the ability to think critically isn’t “freeing up the mind to grow in other ways:” basic critical thought is a foundational prerequisite to fully developing as a person capable of participating in society in the current age in much the same way as basic literacy is. It’s limiting the mind from growing in any meaningful way.

And don’t get it twisted, you’re just saying this shit to be contrarian. I doubt you actually believe this development could be a good thing. Like come the fuck on, let’s say in ten years’ time you get into some kinda accident and need surgery. There is no way you’d would want your surgeon to be someone who ‘did’ most of their assessments in med school with a fucking chatbot. Who are you kidding???

Is it possible that the admins were asked for comment by the paper?

It can be kinda hard to tell with some of the people on here tbh

See that, young women? If you’re hot, and in your 20s, it’s your duty to correct this world by sleeping with old men. Men can be conditioned to be better people if they’re getting laid willingly.

I really hope this is a joke. Otherwise, ew, fuck off, why don’t you do it?

Some implementations also have the problem of constantly pointing cameras at non-consenting passers-by.

L take. There’s no shortage of people on FB posting under their real names some takes that are no better than those of the average /pol/ user. Anonymity is not the problem here.

Shaking my smh at people who say shit like “smh my head” 😔

Loosing what? A volley of arrows? I don’t generally care about small typos like this, but it’s always fun to be the reason an elitist prick is losing at elitism.