Buy another.

Shit happens. As long as he comes back nude, no one is the wider. (Taps head.)

True. But many people can justify it ethically.

Alien: Earth

Martyr for what? You have to deeply stand for something very popular (amongst a group of people with beliefs) that is very unpopular with another group. Of all the people in the world, Peter is not running the risc of becoming a martyr - dead or alive.

I see this mistake as a comment more and more often. I’m not saying anything on him remaining alive or not; that’s a completely different set of questions.

Then they should use a modicum of energy to find the answer as well, instead of expecting someone to hand them a (correct or not) answer. Might even learn a bit more than the answer to the question.

They do if making the most cursory of searches would have told them. It’s not like a downvote is a huge punishment either. Just makes pointless questions easier to sort away.

Learn about index funds and “dollar averaging”. The rest is just adding risk that you won’t get paid for. It will take an hour or two. No more. You will do better than most folks with this and sleep nicer.

Maybe you don’t expect shit data; you just get it. I know, always expect it…

Because this is a simplified example? Maybe you create the object in one place (saying something more realistic like “2015” or whatever your inexperience or AI told you to) and use getTime() at a later place where you thought you created it in a correct way.

Try the game Warewolf (same concept goes by many other names). Most people find it really hard to lie, even if it is about nothing important at all and part of the agreed “social” rules.

Upvotes upon upvotes. Some more relstable than other. The last one hits hard, for example.

I don’t have a dog in the race. I just think you are two big dorks and I love this discussion. I want at least a 20 minute YouTube video of the correct answer and why the other is wrong!

I feel like just-in-time is one of the things that makes most intuitive sence. You used to tie 1M in Inventory and now you tie 100k. Stick the other 900k in a bank account (worst case scenario) and collect the interest.

I speak with authority, but I learnt about it this very day. :)

I hate to be that guy, but it’s neurodivergent. :) neurodiverse is another thing. Everyone is diverse but not everyone is divergent.

More likely, your late’ish habits and searches combined with age and another mountain of data correlated with people that have the same thought. We are no snowflakes.

Edit: I should say, if this example is true. I’m not saying you are lying, just that if you are, it’s not a “gotcha”. This thread is making me paranoid! :)

But you asked it to GUESS and make the answer sound assertive.

That was my point. In think you are reading two comments into one.

Seems like a valid statement from ChatGPT. It did what any human would do and what was asked of it. Actually impressive. I couldn’t tell from your reply if you intended it to be understood like that or not though. :)