That’s another layer of headscratching, yeah. The thing I meant to snark at is how stupidly the “any number” match is written: “make a pointless new group that contains at least one digit - oh, and that group may not exist”, instead of just * which is simply “zero or more of the thing”

lmao ([0-9]+)?

Almost like the guy is some kind of idiot

btw, it has no idea if you said something smart, these things are specifically instructed to kiss maximum ass.

So the only thing you can confidently say based on this information is: it’s 100% certain the entire codebase of Twitter will not be going open source.

“I used to have to check PRs and with LLMs I implicitly trust there’s no malicious shit in them”???

Yeah ok bro

That’s… really just wrong

We already have mechanisms for all of that. Any security it provides you can have without it, the only difference it had going for it was “it has blockchain” and that was the Arbitrary Magic Hype Word at the time - like “AI” is now and “cloud” was before. In reality that means it’s a huge unwieldy system that wastes tons of resources for what’s often really poor reasons.

Same, I guess. But then I also didn’t really expect the “AI” to be a bunch of overhyped nonsense snake oil bullshit, with tremendous practical and ethical problems… so I’ve got to say I feel pretty comfy with the stance.