

I like drugs, but I tend towards psychedelics and do them more to explore than have fun.
And I’m really glad I have. It helps me understand not just myself but history.


I like drugs, but I tend towards psychedelics and do them more to explore than have fun.
And I’m really glad I have. It helps me understand not just myself but history.


No its a llm they made based on his posts and speeches. He is frozen or in a coma and the machine is taped on. His court of backstabbing viziers have the saddest cringiest knife fights ever over the controls every morning, but whoever wins: we lose.


I hate to be on the same side as a .world chud, but, like, this is a question about invasion not all the other myriad fuckery and provocations.
I feel like in America you should be able to do better than a brick. Cars and guns everywhere.
Throw a car full of guns.
We aren’t though. Nobody thinks ahead. It’s all protest reactions and meetings.
If German fairy tales were modern films they’d all be made by like a24 or lionsgate.


You don’t understand! The dems would have made everything better if we hadn’t stabbed them in the back! Republicans didn’t win a single seat on blue-state soil!
STABBED IN THE BACK BY COMMUNISTS!
No we don’t want to do anything about the fascism. Thanks.


Kill your masters. There is no future with them alive.
Try drugs. Do not get addicted to drugs. Seriously, all if them at least once.


You can cut yourself off from capitalism without cutting yourself off from people.


Youre just trying to justify not voting for Harris! This is all your fault! No you dont understand, they had no choice but to discard literally every popular policy! Stupid traitorous left!


I would argue, as the person you’re replying to said, that its the incubators and enforcersbof idiocy that are more culpable, but I’ll accept that it’s a problem with many faces.


i addressed
No you didn’t.
think it will help.
Okay. Talk me through the mechanism. Start with why the problem exists. And do it fast after you read this; prove to both of us that you aren’t reasoning backwards from your conclusion.


But how does including sources make that world? How does it move from point A to point B?
You haven’t thought of that at all. You’re applying reasoning to positions you hold, not reasoning to reach positions.


How is that last statement related to the topic?
Like, I’m not seeing connective tissue here.


And you think this gets us that future how?
Why do people behave like this right now? Thats the first question and I don’t think you had even asked it.


Thwy have value operationally, not rhetorically. At least in theory.
Obviously I haven’t had a lot of luck deriving benefits from being right about things.


easier to answer
You’re still running on the absolute fantasy that people ate rational, and you’re doing worse than nothing to help when you do.
look twice
Not helpful, with the modern tendency to hitlerian readings of… Everything
useful for me
Valid, whatever you find helps, but don’t push it on others as if it will somehow safeguard truth.


I’m saying when you make people who are wrong find community based on beoling wrong they get even more entrenched.
Most people can’t tell the difference between science and bullshit.


Andrew Wakefield says hello.
I got way too much caution from people. Sources in my experience are usually chill enough.