This stuff still gives good slapstick if you’re not careful:

WiFi is never the best solution? Are you fucking stupid?

Brother I been doing this for 30 years. One size never fits all.

not op, but yeah looks like. my old gaming tower is about to get debian installed and go on perma server duty, and the onboard wifi has an antenna like this, which may let me leave it in the garage.

That’s art baby, and AI doesn’t do any of that. It just arrives at the thing.

The argument is there’s value in the journey, and it sounds like there has been a fun one for you on that there guitar.

Different art before the pedal. Unless you never learned, and just always knew how to do the thing?

I think the idea is that the art is the discovery that the pedal and the guitar let you express yourself, and what you express there.

Brandon Sanderson says you are the art. The art is the change that happens in a human in the creative process. AI just can’t experience that. It simply arrives, where we must travel.

Just stop doing it.

“Nah, I’ll wait” is a perfectly valid response.

Same account posted complaining about mods not doing anything about spam, and the mod replied and apologized…

Who writes, posts, or reads this garbage

Hail Satan of course, but welcome I guess.

The headline here omits the quotations around ‘antisemitic’ which is quite deliberate.

Ukraine forfeited sovereignty all the way back in 2014

There it is. Glad we found the position you’re working from.

A RAND report discussing hypothetical ways to pressure Russia is not evidence that the U.S. secretly planned and initiated Russia’s invasion. An opinion article by one strategist in 2021 is not a declaration of NATO policy. Chomsky, Kennan, Matlock, and a 1997 open letter can all argue that NATO expansion was strategically unwise without establishing that Ukraine forfeited its sovereignty or that Putin was compelled to invade.

You’re also confusing “this policy might provoke a reaction” with “the reaction was caused by the policy and is therefore justified.” Those are not the same sentence, no matter how much links you attach to them.

The report was published in 2019, after Russia had already invaded Ukraine in 2014. It discusses escalation risks; it does not say Russia was entitled to invade then, nor in 2022, nor does it transfer responsibility for Putin’s decisions to NATO. Try reading the dates as well as the adjectives.

The report was published in 2019, after Russia had already invaded Ukraine in 2014. It discusses escalation risks; it does not say Russia was entitled to invade, nor does it transfer responsibility for Putin’s decisions to NATO. Try reading the dates as well as the adjectives.

The paper written in 2019 describes how the invasion in 2022 was provoked?

Ah yes, a RAND report listing hypothetical US policy options two years before the UNPROVOKED RUSSIAN INVASION OF UKRAINE is apparently the same thing as NATO personally forcing Putin to do it. By that logic, reading a menu means you cooked the meal. The report may discuss escalation risks, but it doesn’t even suggest that NATO caused Russia’s aggression, much less turn the aggressor into the victim like we see here.

I bolded the correct answer to “what war” up there for ya, since I don’t think you were ever going to get there.