Yup.

Demonstrate a single false claim

The fact AI has yet to do anything other than increase costs, increase the time taken to ship anything (particularly code), decrease trust and socialise the cost of data centres and electricity…

I’d say it’s an all of us problem and a fucking stupid problem to have.

That’s not a use case for users. That’s a use case for a very specific sub group who likely weren’t using the OS at all. Not saying it’s not good they would be able to if that works for them, which I doubt.

Its still not a reason to foist it onto all of us

How many misunderstandings happen because people are bad at both writing and talking?

The answer is, a great deal.

Your answer is nonsense.

There is no real use case for the user. There are only use cases for the company.

I don’t think it’s solely for that reason. There are privacy concerns and concerns the os could be used for the MIC.

I’ll bet.

R placing a bad system with a worse system does not solve the problem

It was another white saviour movie. It was very strange and not something I ever understood

Nothing is ever as secure and private as promised.

None of what you said addresses the problem I mentioned.

Not when exchanges still govern taking money out. They are businesses like everything else and will be just as risk averse

I have to second this. It’s been amazing across the board for so much. Lots of documentation to assist with problems and you learn so much.

Eh, I played Diablo and Diablo 2. You can’t tell me they wouldn’t be better if I ran a dedicated server. With mods. Heh

Which is certainly why it’d be a good thing to do

I wish they dropped the server code for us all to see what metrics etc they’ve been digging for all these years…

I don’t think “killing all live servoce games” would even be bad at this point. When I ran dedicated servers back in the day that was much better.

Removed by mod

Sounds and smells like actual bullshit to me

Even the Zuckerbot trends towards nazism

If you’re of the idea that it’s not a genocide you’re wrong. There is no alternate explanation. If it were giving a fact that would be correct. The fact that it’s giving both sides is an opinion rather than a fact.

If their ibtebtion was fact only. The answer would have been yes