Oh my, yes, you are correct. That was sort of knee jerk, as opposed to it being the reporting party’s burden somehow. I simply cannot understand the legal gymnastics needed to punish your customers for this sort of thing; I’m tired but I feel like this is not exactly an uncommon occurrence. Anyways let us all learn from my mistake and do not be rash and curtail your own freedoms.

So in a just world, google would be heavily penalized for not only allowing csam on their servers, but also for violating their own tos with a customer?

“Bleepification” because the FCC. We live in Afghanistan apparently.

I didn’t know that! Thank you for that tidbit. Also wanna take the time to say I feel I derived more satisfaction learning of the source than I lost from the bummer.

I was trying to explain it more practically, but yes the web is a wasteland.

Yep, noscript on firefox has been available for like 15 years. And it certainly does “break” some sites as it blocks scripts by default. It can be a pain, though I consider it the safest way

As long as I can use as an radar/lidar that can see through walls, as promised.

Impressive in the most literal sense. Indeed.

Moths have always been crazy! They’ll fly into a frickin fire!

Quit yer babblin!

Feels like news headlines are just competing for maximum cognitive dissonance. I guess that’s how you make a profit these days.

Its forbes. A rag I wouldn’t wipe my ass with it.

Here is a link to the Mastadon post where I saw this first, since this link is showing as non-secure.

https://mastodon.world/@kenshirriff@oldbytes.space/112666771797972297

Hah sorry, former redditor here, posting on title alone. That is truly wild but also makes perfect sense.

Didn’t know they were having an Eve Online event.

What’s it called when you sell something you don’t own?