You’re really a condescending prick you know that? You talk to people in person like this?

I can second this as an organizational psychologist. They are almost always anonymous, the ones that aren’t are considered exceptional poor practice.

Yeah, having an abundance of nuclear power is good regardless of the economic system as long as it’s done safely.

Hi, Organizational Psychologist here who works in a lab alongside my personality Psych research supervisor. I have never heard of this method, never read this in any of the literature, and am genuinely disgusted anyone got ethics approval to run this study. The only way we use ML to evaluate personality is using natural language due to the tenants of the lexical hypothesis. I have never seen anyone attempt to create a big five measure from facial recognition nor have I ever heard of any theoretical models for personality based on faces…except for phrenology

Its unfortunate that the way our brains process ingroup and outgroup perceptions leads to such depravity spilling out of what we’d consider those who are true sociopaths into the thoughts and actions of every day people. The bug in the code of human cognition that is social identity theory is essentially dehumanization, the creation of facism, and genocide.

Yeah, I don’t understand what happens in a person’s brain to not have a default of “invading someone and killing their people is inexcusable”

Well, they never said when Israel went too far, just that they have. You can also be misinformed about a subject and retroactively see they went too far much earlier than you thought.

Its not their content (unless they make originals I dont know) they are just distributing Japanese content

“Overcome the issue of democracy”

I don’t know if I’m stupid or not but I tried going to peertube and I couldn’t for the life of my understand what I was looking at. It just seemed like a vague soup of instances with no continuity or ability to know what I was looking at. Maybe I accessed it wrong but I didn’t fully get it.

Link errors out when I try to open it

Refugees from r/pyongyang finding their way to Lemmy

Depends on the context, there is a lot of work in the scientific methods community trying to use NLP to augment traditionally fully human processes such as thematic analysis and systematic literature reviews and you can have protocols for validation there without 100% human review

It’s about Agents, which implies multi step as those are meant to execute a series of tasks opposed to studies looking at base LLM model performance.

The famous tragedy of the commons essay was written by a eugenicist to spread propaganda

It’s a play on words joke

I’m surprised more user friendly distros don’t have this, especially more commercial ones

Knowing this it seems like a very low quality study. They should probably redo this with multiple conditions.

• Base Llama 3
• Tuned Llama 3
• Untrained human summarizer
• trained/professional human summarizer

If you make enough mistakes, speed is a detriment not a benefit. Increasing speed allows you to produce more summaries but if you still need to correct and edit them all you’ve done is add a step where a human has to still read the document to the level where they could summarize it and edit the AI summary. Therefore the bottleneck of a human reading the document and working on a summary is still there. It would only potentially make it slightly easier if the corrections needed are small and obvious.