Not risky as in you’ll get pregnant. Risky as in, if something goes wrong with it, like causing you pain or hormonal issues, you can’t just “stop taking it.” You have to schedule an appointment and have a professional remove it, and who knows how long they might make you wait. It’s probably not that common, but I’ve heard of them becoming slightly displaced and “stabbing” people.
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.worksto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Your stomach gets a new lining every few days so it doesn’t digest itself. Honestly, relatable self-control.
1·4 months agoIf that were true, ulcers would not be a thing.
rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•CBP Tapped Into the Online Advertising Ecosystem To Track Peoples’ MovementsEnglish
110·5 months agoThat’s not blocking them from tracking you. You’re only blocking yourself from seeing the ads they’ve chosen to show you based on the tracking they’ve already done.
rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•Facebook is absolutely cookedEnglish
2·5 months agoCraigslist still exists though. We could just… bring it back by using it again. As a bonus, it’s not an app so it doesn’t track you.
rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.worksto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Ad companies are the ones destroying civilization
41·5 months agoI think you’re giving Campbell way more credit than he is generally given by the writing community at large. Yes, that is one way to write a story, but it’s certainly not the only method taught. For example, slice-of-life stories are completely acceptable, however it is harder to get some of the nuance across to new writers. The hero’s journey is an easy starting point, that’s all. And I really don’t think Campbell was trying to say that’s how everything should be. He was making observations about what he already saw in popular western media.
I don’t understand your seeming conflation of advertising and art, which seems like a separate point from your criticism of Campbell. Advertising does not control art, nor vice versa. It makes more sense to look at things through the lens of money: art can be basically free to create (writing, drawing, street art are all pretty cheap). Anyone can do it. Now, something like making a film is not cheap. It can cost millions of dollars, and not many people have enough lying around to do so without getting a return on that investment. In other words, film has to make money. They know the hero’s journey will sell because it is easy for the average Westerner to digest and enjoy. So you see a lot more hero’s journey stories on the screen than you do in the wide world of books, which can afford to be more experimental or art-driven. Someone like Banksy isn’t worried about finding a rich buyer to recoup the cost of his stencils and paint. Would you agree?
Advertising is a different beast altogether, and I’m not sure why you would criticize it for not being art. It was never supposed to be that.
rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•Restaurant Uses AI for Menu, Accidentally Describes Appetizer in Way So Disgusting That We May Never RecoverEnglish
2·1 year agoA third party delivery service doesn’t even need to contract with with the restaurant to sell their food. They can create their own website, food descriptions, and price markups, and the restaurant might not even know they’re doing it.
Don’t watch Racing in the Rain. That movie was pure psychological torture.


Big cities have started putting lighted crosswalk indicators on the ground because people are so glued to their phones they don’t see them at eye level. So yes, people are stupid enough to walk into traffic while looking at a phone. Also, it is really obvious to others when you’re navigating with a phone. Scammers realize you’re not from the area and now you’re a target because you look like a tourist.