• 0 Posts
  • 169 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle



  • In reverse order:

    • Directly mapping structs to JSON is a solved problem in userland for every major language
    • yes it does, and worse it’s part of the return signature and null is super-prevalent of necessity as a result
    • even java doesn’t do that any more, but fine I guess
    • cool, but access modifiers actually make a lot of sense. Go’s solution to this is to use capitalisation as a marker, which has no ‘inferential readability’ – public/private is obvious. Foo/foo? Considerably less so

    Further, meta programming in go sucks donkey balls. Sure, it finally got generics but also they suck. Last I checked it still didn’t even support covariance.




  • Ironically Go is such a shite verbose language that basically everyone I know who has to work with it will use an llm code-assistant tool to avoid having to write all the boilerplate themselves.

    I know of no other language that comes close to prompting the level of LLM-dependency that Go inspires.

    Edit: well, seems like this goes against the popular consensus but I stand by my guns if the down votes are from average Go enjoyers. If, on the other hand, the down votes stem from the sentiment that even Go should not be vibe coded, I can at least agree with that, but who knows what jimmies I’ve rustled








  • silasmariner@programming.devtoMemes@lemmy.ml"Earning a living"
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Batshit doomerism, you sound like one of those religious nuts expecting the rapture any minute. You don’t have some privileged insight into ‘how bad things are gonna get’ or whatever hypothetical revolution you’ve conjectured, yet you presume to lecture others about it. Please, tell me again about narcissism and what it consists of.


  • silasmariner@programming.devtoMemes@lemmy.ml"Earning a living"
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I guess you had a pretty unpleasant life so far? Not everybody’s has sucked. But I don’t think I need to form a coherent argument against 'all reproduction is inherently morally bankrupt ’ - it’s such deliberate bait that it rejects good faith discussion off-hand.

    Is there a more coherent argument to be made against hyper-natalists? Yes, I think that could plausibly be upheld. But that would be a more nuanced stance. The world, despite its trajectory, is not a hellscape.