It reminds me of the reaction of the public to 1896 documentary The Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat Station. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'Arrivée_d'un_train_en_gare_de_La_Ciotat

You described a hypothetical scenario that is the actual scenario we’re already living in. People doing no good (CEOs, investors) are already cashing in and are demanding an oversight on the investment.

I’ve spent many hours on this and I still do not understand the real problem. What’s the real problem?

How do you use these devices responsibly?

Credit card transactions and many banks too. Source: https://www.precisely.com/blog/mainframe/9-mainframe-statistics

Are you suggesting my 90’s calculator is smarter than LLM’s?

Stochastic parrot

No, that’s an oversimplification. The judge has been asking the representatives in Brazil to block some accounts that have been spreading disinformation. The representatives replied to the judge saying they’re just representatives and X/Twitter wouldn’t comply with that request. In Brazil, if you’re the representative of a company, you have to have the power to comply with Brazil’s laws. As they were not complying, the judge gave them extra time to comply and mentioned if they didn’t comply, the local president/director/representative would go to jail. That’s when X/Twitter closed the representation in Brazil.

After that, the only action left available for the judge was to block X/Twitter.

Google and Apple were notified in order to block access to X/Twitter’s app in Brazil on their app stores.

“Today”, right. I wish you a good weekend stranger.