You should read the Python documentation for how many ways there are to set it up. It’s not easy. It might be easy for a pro, but for a beginner it will be a nightmare. Python’s own documentation is thousands of words long for how to get it running correctly, it’s the exact opposite of what you want for beginners. And no it’s most definitely not the most human readable. They call it Ruby Prose for a reason.

I’m not here to have a flame war over Python vs other stuff, but I’ve used both professionally for over a decade. Python is good at stuff, but being human readable by beginners and having good tooling are not even in its ballpark. It has syntax unlike any other modern language and its tooling is shite. https://chriswarrick.com/blog/2023/01/15/how-to-improve-python-packaging/

Java is much easier to set up than Python is. For one Java works with mise, asdf, sdkman and numerous other automatic tool managers. Python on the other hand works with none of those. I wouldn’t recommend either for being easy to set up. Ruby is much easier than both (including my favorite language, Kotlin) and has just as many nice features and is much easier to read than Python.

If only it were that easy. Like i said, my job for years was literally deploying scripts and software to a fleet of machines including Macs and windows laptops. Every single install would have something go wrong, every single time.

Absolutely do not use Python. It’s a nightmare to install on random computers and the majority of your time spent will be trying to get it working on everyone’s computer (that was my job at one point). As far as I remember, there isn’t a “good” C compiler that comes on windows and the one on Mac is missing some stuff.

I’d go with Ruby, it’s dead simple to install on every OS, easy to teach and learn, and doesn’t work differently across OSes. There’s an installer for it for windows and it comes installed by default on Mac (or it did? Maybe they stopped that).

~/dev

~/dev/oss

~/dev/work

~/dev/personal

Thankfully it was named after the peanut butter and given a nice slogan to boot so you always know how to pronounce it properly!

Dude. I have zero problem with germs. I think we need to be washing our hands less. It’s causing us (verified with many, many studies) to have more allergies and be more prone to sickness.

I do have a problem with morons saying that buttholes are the cleanest part of your body and then suggesting to eat ass. It’s so scientifically inaccurate as to be insulting. You’re so far off on understanding my position (which I’ve stated numerous times now) I can only assume you are trying to misrepresent my position to make me look like an idiot.

You can fuck right off, thank you for nothing.

Huh??? What are you talking about?

No clue what the last of us looks like but you’re literally making my point for me. No part of your body is clean, arguing a fucking butthole is clean is absolutely insane and is in no way scientifically accurate. Yes, there is bacteria everywhere. There are poop particles everywhere. Ergo, there is poop everywhere. How the hell is poop getting everywhere if your fucking BUTTHOLE IS CLEAN???

I didn’t say they were dangerously or infectious, where the hell did you read that? I said there’s clearly stuff coming out of your butthole all the time, it’s not a clean location, no matter how much you clean it. Acting like putting some soap on it means it’s clean in an hour is completely disingenuous and scientifically inaccurate. And the example I gave was of one single thing coming out. If one thing is coming out then more is as well.

They are particles that came out of your ass. It’s not like you just magically smell fart when someone rips without something traveling from their butthole to your nose.

Edit: How in the world am I being downvoted for something that is unequivocally true. Mercaptans are particles. They come out of your ass.

No… that would be insane. Do you wash hand towels after washing your hands each time? Both things are incredibly wasteful and completely unnecessary.

Asshole is not clean dude. You fart, if you’re smelling it that is literally poop particles you’re smelling. Your butthole is not clean. Everything else sure.

Firefox. If you want them to all be disableable with a single toggle then make a pull request. FF is open source.

No, neither. You’re making up a position and pretending like I believe that to make my argument look weak. I’m not the one posting shit sources.

I mean it is obvious after reading, the problem is that most people aren’t going to read the sources, they’re just reading the comment. They’re not going to click through and see that several are literally Chinese propaganda sites. They’re going to take the original comment at face value. If they then skip the sources and read my comment stating what the sources actually are then they’re less likely to be influenced.

Seeing as how pulling out of a country is incredibly difficult, I would not in any way say that that is cooperating with Israel. And Israel has the number one teams that crack iPhone security so I’m fairly confident that even if Apple locked down their phones from Israel, they would still manage to use them. Of course it would be better if Apple even tried to do what you suggest, but in actuality it’s a logistical and most likely futile effort.

Go ahead and post the same link for Google job listings. I’ll wait.

Having jobs in the country has nothing to do with being a “committed partner”. You’re making up connections that are most likely not there. Same for anyone claiming the same about Google. Microsoft on the other hand is directly selling and assisting the IDF, they are a committed partner.

If that were true then non western sources would have plenty of news articles, yet all ml users post are things directly from Russia or China or “alternative” “sources” like medium (which isn’t a source). There are plenty of regimes that do not align with anything America has to say, yet no news articles from them.

If someone claims to solve string theory and then provides shit sources there is never an obligation to provide sources that solve string theory. Pointing out sources are shit is part of science. I don’t need to provide a counter argument because that’s not the purpose of the conversation. I don’t need to provide proof of the alternative because the only thing I’m trying to accomplish is to stop this liar from spreading misinformation.

A lie can travel around the world before the truth takes a few steps. That’s exactly what that user is trying to do. Post as many lies as possible so that refuting them takes hours if not days if not months or years.