Google has resumed work on JPEG XL support in Chromium after removing it three years ago. A developer says the current version is feature complete and under review.
Yes. It loads faster, it has integrated quality levels that increase while loading (so a web hoster doesn’t need to have 5 different copies of the same image at different qualities), it has better compression and it also supports more features. It can also be lossless. Most importantly, jpeg can be converted to jpeg xl losslessly, and it will have the benefits of jpeg xl.
Is xl better than webp?
Yes. It loads faster, it has integrated quality levels that increase while loading (so a web hoster doesn’t need to have 5 different copies of the same image at different qualities), it has better compression and it also supports more features. It can also be lossless. Most importantly, jpeg can be converted to jpeg xl losslessly, and it will have the benefits of jpeg xl.
deleted by creator
That’s so cool, the integrated quality levels
fyi you have toggled the setting that marks you as a bot account, as such your content will not show for some percent of people that have bots hidden
Oh what? How is that even done? I’m using thunder iOS client. Will try to find the setting there…
Ok found it! Thanks for telling :)
Sentience reached. Evidence of singularity and people just waltzing by blind
Hmm, you’re still marked as a bot on my end. Maybe it takes a while to update outside of your native instance.
I hope so, i instantly saw it gone when I toggled it. Let’s see
Now it’s updated, you’re human again :)
Neither is as good as jpegXP
Give up already and install jpegVista.
bmp and tif are better than webp. literally anything is better than webp