• schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        The United States greatly prefers that corporations be in charge of the government to governments being in charge of corporations.

          • doben@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That‘s a reach, if I ever saw one. China lifted more than 800 million people out of poverty, and in fact eradicated poverty at all. Last I heard, their standard of living just closely missed being in the high income countries category. Their trajectory is in complete contrast to the declining Western empire.

            China is better at capitalism, because it‘s their only play to stay sovereign and overcome this predatory system completely. They have to prove to the capitalist world, that their system and long term development is superior and it‘s only beneficial for the world to follow their transition towards socialism to enable prosperity for all humankind, not just the global north. Not gonna happen under capitalism, especially not under the US or the EU.

            Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      My guess is that these Chinese manufacturers will kill the old automakers that are in rapid decline after decades of low quality products at high prices.

      I don’t know if the Chinese brands have good quality but they’re priced lower than the expensive low quality trash that’s already on the market from all the other automakers.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        sell cheap to kill competition around the world. leverage new global monopoly for fun and profits later.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          This. I’m all for competition and innovation, but this is subsidized by the Chinese government to exploit a lack of manufacturing in other countries.

          If you’ve heard about how food or clothing donations harm local farmers and weavers, same principle. We should be encouraging domestic production around the world, not allowing one country to undercut everyone else.

          • pdxfed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 day ago

            China has been playing the long game for 30+ years. When you have actual history and strategy(and unlimited exploitable labor( you’d be amazed what you can accomplish.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            Let me repeat it: China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            And because it doesn’t ever seem to sink in: China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            Newsflash: Sinophobia is not an economic strategy.

            Edit: "“All for competition and innovation” The United States barred China from buying the latest NVIDIA chips to keep it out of AI. Typical American racist scapegoating.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              This thread is so fucking ignorant and choking on MAGA propaganda. Look this up idiots: the US of A has subsidized Detroit far more than China in the auto industry and BYD was heavily invested by US investors like Warren Buffet.

              Warren Buffet bought 10% of BYD because US options were all losers. From 2008 to 2022 he made $8.75B.

              • boonhet@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                26 minutes ago

                The USA has yet to kill the UAW which they must do to be competitive. It’s not an end-all be-all solution (wages are only like 30% of the cost of a car), but a good start. It also needs an entirely local battery supply chain, buying from China isn’t an option. And they need to pay for every EV that is manufactured, no matter where it’s sold to.

                But the US won’t take it seriously so they’ll never compete for real. Maybe they’ll kill UAW but only to increase shareholder value, not to compete for real.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          They use this same tactic over and over and I find it surprising that more people don’t immediately recognize what they’re doing.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I guess it’s just more enticing than “maximise profits for the few even if it means the planet dying”. All western auto makers can get squeezed for all I care. I’d buy their products, but they spent a decade sabotaging it and making sure it keeps spewing poison.

            I have no pity for toxic companies that fought tooth and nail against EV development. The tactic works because it’s taking advantage of a broken system.

        • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Don’t worry, I’m sure there’s another bailout and another cash for clunkers with a side of tariffs getting cooked up by some lobbyist to get passed by some paid off politicians. They are already trying to/already have pass(ed) a complete ban on Chinese autos. Knock knock, they are already on both borders.

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Nah. It’s just another rug pull in preparation. Undercut prices until the competition breaks, then fuck things up with your monopoly. We’re in the undercutting prices phase, but the Chinese will want to have their fair share of interest on the subsidies they use to do that right now. It’s the same old fucking capitalism again and nothing is saved from it.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Everyone said this would happen when Japanese cars started being sold in the US. It never happened.

        Detroit isn’t even trying to compete.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah. Companies running on state subsidies competing with others who are not is not capitalism “working”, it’s just another rug pull leaving us all fucked.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I guess in this fantasy scenario of yours, the United States is the one that doesn’t subsidize the auto industry? lol

          • cabbage@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I love how criticizing the Chinese car industry leads people to asssume I love the American one.

            The US hasn’t produced a decent car since the 60s. I don’t even factor them into the calculation.

              • cabbage@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Not to the same degree or in the same way. In the US the name of the game is to have companies run themselves into the ground to line the pockets of CEOs and investors, and then the state bailing them out every time because of jobs and national pride.

                I’m sure there are other systems in place as well, but frankly I don’t care. Teslas are pretty much the only American cars you’ll see in Europe, and they’ve been subsidized by European countries to promote the electronic transition.

                In short, I don’t think about American cars at all.