• Lutra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    System has been running on floppy disks for 50 years… people : “Floppy disks are not reliable!”

    <sigh>

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Somebody out there is thinking “why not vibe code it and get it done by AI fast?”

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I hear AI would make a great traffic controller. Surely you wouldn’t regret replacing human traffic controllers with AI.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Old tech is solid and reliable. Do you really want the modern tech ethos of “move fast and break stuff” to apply to Air Traffic Control? I wouldn’t trust the big tech companies to write software for red-lights without killing people.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I grew up with floppy discs. Once we had hard shells on them they were fine. I never had one fail.

        Did have some MBR viruses back in the day though.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Moving away from floppy discs in 2026 is moving fast and breaking things? Peak Lemmy moment.

    • halloween_spookster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Old tech still requires maintenance and replacement parts. This tech is so old that they can’t effectively provide either. I 100% agree with you that you don’t want to “move fast and break things” but there does need to be a program to upgrade over time to deal with the maintenance and replacement problems, as well as improve capabilities and safety. The fact that some ATC systems completely crashed in recent months, leaving air traffic in a very dangerous state, is evidence of this problem.

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The floppy disk is 60 years old. In which universe is migrating away from 60-year-old technology “moving fast and breaking stuff”?!

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        20 hours ago

        What are they moving to? Because that’s what the comment is referencing. The new tech they are moving to, not the old tech.

        • Skunk@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I know it’s a rethorical question but from what I’ve seen they updated their “information display”.

          In my country our equivalent is an in-house Java software running on Linux thin clients. The software basically shows meteorological information, runways status, airspace status and stuff like that, so it is connected to a network in order to receive those informations.

          So I’m wondering why FAA used the floppy disks? Was it to update the information? MET is updated every 30 minutes, day and night. That’s a handful of manual updates to do…

          PS: Their brand new "Enterprise Information Display System (E-IDS)” is what we do in Europe since, uhh, 30 years ?

            • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Because they didn’t upgrade their systems in time while deep knowledge of these systems were intact and would have made upgrading seamlessly much easier. Now they have black boxes that no one truly understands anymore, so they’re paralyzed by fear and that’s what’s keeping them trapped in these old systems.

              • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                No, because when infrastructure is sophisticated, critical, and expensive enough, you don’t just go around replacing it.

                I bring up Legacy Code for a reason. as one of the few organizations in the world that can spend so many millions of dollars on code that they can virtually guarantee that it’s bug free.

                And as for the cobalt code in the banking industry, the entire world could shut down if things went wrong by replacing it.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s not so much that new tech is bad … new tech could be made to be ten times safer than what we have now.

      The problem is that the new tech is controlled by psychopaths who want to squeeze as much profit out of everything imaginable … imagine all that new tech controlling air traffic but its all locked up by proprietary software that would hold entire airports, agencies and governments hostage, or be made available to the highest bidder and even for international opponents or enemies … and all of it up for grabs for profit and regardless of morals, ethics or human decency.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Floppy discs reliable? I remember mine not working if I transported them in my backpack when it was cold outside. They came back to life when “thawed”, but I’d prefer airliners use something better!

          • username_1@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You don’t have copyright-scmiopyright permission to read it anyway. It isn’t in the public domain – 100500 years haven’t passed for that.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        These don’t get transported like that. We’re talking climate control and backups and so on. It’s reliable because the failure rates and causes are known and accounted for.

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You don’t understand what I mean, floppy discs lose memory easily. It’s not a safe storage medium. Everyone who has used them knows this. Use the paper with holes in instead 😁 can’t be that hard to push some kilobytes onto it 😂

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Lol.

            Everyone who has used them knows this.

            I started out on 8" floppy disk back in the day when disks were actually floppy. Switch to 5.25" and then 3.5" before going to CD-ROMs.

            Back then people were storing them in paper sleeves (or cardboard) and your average kid was handling them with dirty hands and ignoring pretty much anything and everything that caused them to degrade including touching the interior film. I fondly remember using the spring loaded shutter or a 3.5" as a fidget toy.

            I’m well aware of the failures these things have and the way they are required to be kept to account for that including backups, and care instructions.

            The point isn’t that they fail. They have known failure rates and known failure causes. Protocols can be put in place to account for literally all of that and this is what makes the medium reliable and cost effective for this use case.

            You’re talking to someone who was loading navigation data and software updates onto planes with 3.5" floppy until fairly recently in their career.

            This is as much about the hardware in use as it is about the storage medium. Upgrading depends on some things.

            Cost

            Upgradability path availability over full on replacement and the downtime of doing so.

            The ability to make what you are upgrading to stable, secure, and backwards compatible to a degree.

            All of those things have to be taken into consideration and accounted for.

            https://vger.to/infosec.pub/comment/24545251

            • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Lol I’m a senior software engineer and I used 5" floppies I mean it was in my post if you read it or maybe it’s your memory that has run its course 😱 (BTW people ruined floppies putting their thumb on the read area, or ruined them by fidgeting with the 3"5 ones, what’s your point about that?) no need to come to the rescue of an ancient crap organisation (computer wise) or is it yours or something 😂

              • atrielienz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                One of us works in this industry and understands what’s going on and the other of us is currently trying to throw their weight around because they didn’t like an anecdote and didn’t read the article.

                If we’re going to start throwing around ageism, I’m done with this conversation. You have a nice day.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Other countries would be horrified to hear that critical infrastructure had been so neglected, but this is just another day in the US of fucking A

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It really is a crazy country. I can’t imagine the stress of living there.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s fairly typical of aviation around the world

      Old is safe, and if it’s reliable, why change it?

      We just add new layers on top of the old system

      For the record, whole lot of planes using floppy disks too

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      There was actually a benefit to being behind the curve on this.

      The scheduling is done on modern machines, the actual flight control console is a glorified comms station with a very beefy audio recorder.

      It’s built to last, and to be as reliable as possible, while still being repairable by a skilled technician.

      Any update needs to be as solid and reliable as what it replaces. That’s the key, not being advanced or some shit.

      • Skunk@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        ICAO world is behind the curve yeah but not a century behind.

        OPS tech is old protocols like X25 and X400 but on IP, not on serial cables and switches.

        Networks are using fiber channels, servers are using VMs, kubernetes clusters and stuff like that. It’s old tech on modern hardware. Even the voice coms went full VOIP (at least for gnd-gnd com) during the last decade.

        Yes we stay behind the tech curve on purpose, but FAA lagging so much behind the rest of the world is just another proof of their lack of investment.

    • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Apparently they believe an unreliable storage medium that hasn’t been manufactured in more than twenty years may not be trustworthy enough for a life critical system anymore. That, or finding “new” floppies is more expensive than making the switch…

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You need a computer to do a thing, ALL you want is the command prompt and thing doing.exe

      Can’t hack a floppy disk remotely, it’s the OG air gap

  • dou9m@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I don’t trust it happening well under Trump so I’m going to take this as a sign to be prepared for far more crashes in the next two years.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        That kind of bullshit thinking is why I have to do shitty half-assed solutions because I need to work around unsupported equipment that’s 50 years old and was EOL’ed three decades ago. At some point you absolutely should upgrade even if it isn’t broken.

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The absolute #1 priority in aviation is safety. Old, stable systems are safer. Just add new systems in parallel for new features

        • 3laws@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It fact you just gave us the true answer.

          If it ain’t broke don’t fix it, so now when it breaks it can’t be fixed.

    • cdnk5@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Lol I use software every day that was written in COBOL. It would cost billions to replace. So leadership never wants to add that expense to their budget so they just hobble along and leave it for the next people.

      • walden@wetshav.ing
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure the software I use for work is written in COBOL too, but they’re currently in a multi-year rollout of a modern replacement. So that’s good, I guess.